Is my paper used to train AI models?

Never. Your paper is processed and never stored, kept encrypted while in use, and is never shared with third parties or used to train any model. Your research stays yours.

How is this different from just asking ChatGPT?

A single chatbot gives you one model’s one-shot opinion. PaperScore runs three independent expert models in parallel across five review lenses (methods, originality, citations, logic, and writing), then has them debate each other’s findings over three rounds before signing a single, agreed verdict.

Which file formats can I upload?

PDF, Microsoft Word (.docx), and LaTeX (.tex). Citations and formatting are cleaned up automatically, so you can submit straight from whatever you wrote in.

What exactly does the review check?

The same things a real reviewer checks: solid methods, originality and contribution, citation accuracy and coverage, sound logic, and the clarity of your write-up.

Will it replace human peer review?

No. It prepares you for it. PaperScore is a pre-submission tool that surfaces the gaps in your methods, weak citations, and gaps in logic a reviewer would catch, so you can fix them before you submit rather than after a rejection.

Does it work for my field?

Yes. The review lenses (rigor, originality, citations, logic, and clarity) are universal across disciplines, so PaperScore works in any field, from the life sciences to the humanities.

How long does a review take?

Minutes, not weeks. The three experts run concurrently and stream their analysis live. You watch the review and the debate unfold in real time, exactly like the transcript shown above.

Your paper's first review should happen here.

Upload your draft. Watch three AI experts review, debate, and score every part of your research.

Upload Paper

See a sample report

A research paper marked up with reviewer annotations flagging bugs and mistakes

From rough draft to submission-ready.

Find flaws, strengthen arguments, and discover new citations, before a reviewer does.

page 1 / 14.pdf

Extractingparsing

Title

Authors

Citations

Sections

Structure Map6 nodes

Build your private paper profile.

Upload .tex, .docx, or .pdf files. We read and structure your paper: title, abstract, sections, figures, and references, ready for review.

Receive critiques from specialized agents.

The team gets to work. Three independent reviewers each weigh methods, originality, citations, logic, and writing, then debate their findings.

Review Session

R2 / 3

Methodology7.2

Sample size of n=240 limits generalization claims

Novelty6.8

Closest prior: Chen 2024 78% overlap on contrastive loss

Citation8.1

Missing foundational refs: Vaswani '17, He '16

Cross-Examination14 / 21

Verdict

Accept w/ Revisions

+12 vs draft 1

94/100

Methodology

Novelty

Citation

Logic

Writeup

Reviewer match

87%

Improve relationships with reviewers.

Submit with confidence. Our report answers common reviewer complaints before they’re raised, for a smoother review process.

View Sample Report

The Experts

Three experts, working together.

Five areas checked by three independent reviewers, then debated to a verdict.

Active

Methodology

Experimental Rigor

scanning

“I am scanning for methodological gaps. I probe experimental design, controls, statistical power, and whether your methods actually justify the claims.”

Pass Probability

87.4%

Issues Flagged

03findings

Methodology

Experimental Rigor

scanning

“I am scanning for methodological gaps. I probe experimental design, controls, statistical power, and whether your methods actually justify the claims.”

Pass Probability

87.4%

Issues Flagged

03findings

Inside the chamber

Watch the debate, word for word.

This is the screen you'll see during every review: three independent models cross-examining each other's findings before they sign a verdict.

paperscore · review in progressReplay

AI REVIEW TEAM

3-Reviewer Structured Debate

Round 1 · Cross-Examination

Round 1

Cross-Examination

Reviewer 1

Condensed sample transcript. Every review streams live, exactly like this.

The deliverable

A report you can act on.

Three independent reviewers, scored across five lenses out of 10, reconciled over a structured debate into one verdict, with every issue mapped back to your paper.

paperscore · peer review reportSample

Final verdict

Minor Revision3 reviewers · 3-round debate

0.0/10

Overall

Issues

Methodologically sound with a strong contribution; reviewers converged on minor revisions: tighten the novelty framing against prior art and shore up 20 flagged passages before resubmission.

Methodology

0.0/103 flagged

Novelty

0.0/105 flagged

Citation

0.0/102 flagged

Logic

0.0/104 flagged

Write-up

0.0/106 flagged

20 revisions located in your PDF12 citation suggestionsJournal recommendations

Illustrative sample. Every review produces a verdict, per-lens scores, and an actionable revision plan like this.

Who it's for

Built for every kind of submission.

Wherever your work is headed, the review adapts to what that audience looks for.

Journal submissions

Catch the method and citation gaps that trigger instant rejections, before an editor ever sees them.

Theses & dissertations

Stress-test your argument and rigor the way a committee will, chapter by chapter.

Conference papers

Tighten originality and clarity against a hard deadline, with a full verdict in minutes.

Grant proposals

Surface unsupported claims and gaps in logic before reviewers score your application.

Peer reviewers

Get a fast, structured second opinion to anchor your own review and check what you missed.

Exceptional tools for exceptional research.

Spot errors, improve clarity, and increase your chances of acceptance.

Debate-style Review

One agent raises a critique, another defends the author. A lead agent combines their arguments into one balanced report.

We store nothing

Your paper is processed, then immediately deleted. We never train on user submissions, ensuring your research stays yours.

Any file format

Accepts LaTeX, PDF, and DOCX. We automatically clean up citations and formatting, whatever the source.

Why PaperScore

Not a chatbot. Not a six-month wait.

A single model guesses. A journal takes months. PaperScore gives you a structured, multi-expert verdict in minutes.

PaperScore compared with traditional peer review and other AI tools
	PaperScore	Generic AI chatbot	Waiting for review
Three independent expert reviewers
Structured debate to one verdict
Citation & reference analysis
Five-lens rigor check
Feedback before you submit
Never trains AI on your IP
Turnaround	Minutes	Minutes	Weeks–months
Cost to start	Free	Varies	Free

Pricing

Start at $4.99 Upgrade when you need more.

Buy a single review for $4.99, or subscribe for a monthly allowance. Every plan ships the full multi-agent review panel.

Starter

$4.99one-time

Pay-as-you-go — a single review, no subscription

1 full review per purchase
Full multi-agent review panel
50 expert chat messages per review
Journal recommendations

Questions, answered.

Everything you need to know before your first review.

Ready to strengthen your research?

Join thousands of researchers using PaperScore to refine their work before submission.