Journal submissions
Catch the methodology and citation gaps that trigger desk rejections, before an editor ever sees them.
Multi-Agent Peer Review for Researchers
Find incredible rigor
through intelligent agents
A council of specialized AI agents that scrutinize your manuscript for novelty, methodology, and logic, before you submit.
Built for researchers at institutions like
The Council
Orchestrated intelligence, working in harmony.
Five specialized agents inspect your manuscript in parallel, then debate.
v2
Active
Methodology
Experimental Rigor
scanning“I am scanning for methodological gaps. My model audits sample size, statistical power, and reproducibility against a corpus of 4.2M papers.”
Pass Probability
87.4%
Issues Flagged
03findings
Methodology
Experimental Rigor
scanning“I am scanning for methodological gaps. My model audits sample size, statistical power, and reproducibility against a corpus of 4.2M papers.”
Pass Probability
87.4%
Issues Flagged
03findings
Inside the chamber
Watch the debate, word for word.
This is the screen you'll see during every review: three independent models cross-examining each other's findings before they sign a verdict.
paperscore · review in progressReplay
AI REVIEW COUNCIL
3-Reviewer Structured Debate
Round 1 · Cross-Examination
Round 1
Cross-ExaminationA
Condensed sample transcript. Every review streams live, exactly like this.
From rough draft to submission-ready.
Find flaws, strengthen arguments, and discover new citations, before a reviewer does.
page 1 / 14.pdf
Extractingparsing
Title
Authors
Citations
Target Venue
Knowledge Graph6 nodes
1
Build your private manuscript profile.
Upload .tex, .docx, or .pdf files. We sanitize the data, build a knowledge graph of your claims, and signal your intended target venue.
2
Receive critiques from specialized agents.
The Council convenes. Methodology checks your stats, Novelty Navigator compares your work against 4.2M papers to find gaps.
Council Session
R2 / 3
Methodology7.2
Sample size of n=240 limits generalization claims
Novelty6.8
Closest prior: Chen 2024 78% overlap on contrastive loss
Citation8.1
Missing foundational refs: Vaswani '17, He '16
Cross-Examination14 / 21
Verdict
Accept w/ Revisions
+12 vs draft 1
94/100
Methodology
92
Novelty
88
Citation
95
Logic
91
Writeup
96
Reviewer match87%
3
Improve relationships with reviewers.
Submit with confidence. Our report gives you a pre-emptive defense against common reviewer complaints, ensuring a smoother review process.
View Sample ReportThe deliverable
A report you can act on.
Every review ends in a structured verdict: per-lens scores, the exact issues to fix, and citation suggestions.
paperscore · review reportSample
Final verdict
Borderline: Revise & Resubmit
84/100
Readiness
20
Issues
Methodology
87.4%3 flagged
Novelty
72.1%5 flagged
Citation
94.0%2 flagged
Logic
81.3%4 flagged
Write-up
90.5%6 flagged
12 citation suggestionsStep-by-step revision plan included
Illustrative sample. Every review produces a verdict, scores, and an actionable revision plan like this.
Who it's for
Built for every kind of submission.
Wherever your work is headed, the review adapts to what that audience scrutinizes.
Theses & dissertations
Pressure-test your argument and rigor the way a committee will, chapter by chapter.
Conference papers
Tighten novelty and clarity against a hard deadline, with a full verdict in minutes.
Grant proposals
Surface unsupported claims and logical leaps before reviewers score your application.
Peer reviewers
Get a fast, structured second opinion to anchor your own review and check what you missed.
Why Paperscore
Not a chatbot. Not a six-month wait.
A single model guesses. A journal takes months. Paperscore gives you a structured, multi-expert verdict in minutes.
| Paperscore | Generic AI chatbot | Waiting for review | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Three independent expert reviewers | |||
| Structured debate to one verdict | |||
| Citation & DOI verification | |||
| Five-lens rigor check | |||
| Feedback before you submit | |||
| Zero-retention of your IP | |||
| Turnaround | Minutes | Minutes | Weeks–months |
| Cost to start | Free | Varies | Free |
FAQ
Questions, answered.
Everything you need to know before your first review.
Exceptional tools for exceptional research.
Spot errors, improve clarity, and increase your chances of acceptance.
Adversarial Review
One agent proposes a critique, another defends the author. The Orchestrator synthesizes the conflict into a balanced report.
Zero-Retention Policy
Your IP is processed in a stateless environment. We never train on user submissions, ensuring your research stays yours.
Format Agnostic
Accepts LaTeX, PDF, and DOCX. We automatically normalize citations and formatting regardless of the source.
Ready to strengthen your research?
Join thousands of researchers using Paperscore to refine their work before submission.
Register Today